Friday, November 04, 2022

Squatober 2022

Juggled off days, took a little longer to finish than 30 days because of some family stuff. Probably a good thing, as I recall feeling beat up doing 5/2s in years past. I think I'm better off doing 3/1,2/1 or something like that.

A few doubles of the same workout this year, the workout variety was stale late in the program. There was a see-saw day, a 21 to party day, and only one day of front squats.
Most notably, slow eccentrics and paused squats worked early magic.
 
I didn't feel strong last year (after losing a whole month to Covidpneumonia, I was still bouncing back in October) and was just glad to complete the program then. This year, after 9 months of walking lunges, hip thrusters and extensions, with some squatting all year, I felt stronger. The slow eccentrics and pauses really gave me confidence. My bracing felt solid this year too, like my core wasn't flimsy and working against me.
Still don't have the top end that I would like, I only got 320 on PR day (missed at 330). However, my 75%-85% reps all felt good and doable throughout. In years past, they didn't. They felt heavy then, this year not so much. I'll take it.

Nutrition for the month:
2800 cals/day was goal, 2757 was actual. 
Fat: 117g/day, Carb 185/day, Protein 234 which is a win. 

A good month.

Monday, October 03, 2022

Velocity 2022 - 6 Week August and Sprintember.

Caught on T-Nation that Dan John was going to run this V-diet (version 4.0) 15 years after doing it as v1.0. I did this back in 2011, so only 11 years ago for me - one of the first cyclic programs I attempted as I started tracking macros. 

The first itineration only had a solid meal once a week; this 4.0 version lets one have a solid meal once daily.

The main points for 4.0:

1. Protein Pulses: You consume four fortified fat-burning protein-pulsing shakes daily as the core of the plan, one at breakfast, lunch, midday, and bedtime.

2. Healthy Solid Meal: You have a daily healthy whole-food evening meal.

3. Critical Supplements: You also take two other caffeine-free supplements; one that provides omega-3 fatty acids (Flameout) and an ingredient that inhibits fat storage (Micellar Curcumin). Superfood is optional and supplies whole-food extracts of berries, fruits, vegetables, and greens.

4. Cold-Water Pulses: You drink eight 8-ounce glasses of cold water to help the body function optimally for fat loss and muscle gain.

5. Power Walks and Activities: You go on one power walk a day and opt for a more physical life where ever possible (taking the stairs, parking farther away, packing groceries, etc.).

6. Mindful Eating: You’re taught mindful eating techniques that make your food taste better and reduce and eliminate cravings.

7. Recovery Sleep and Rest: You’re encouraged to sleep nine hours or longer each night for optimal hormone regulation and accelerated body-composition changes.

8 and 9 involve having them coach you (no exercise plan with this, there was one with 3.0) and keeping a dietary log.

I consumed protein (not the T-Nation product, just Costco Gold Isolate) 3x/day instead of 4x, which got me to an average of 250g/day, took vitamins, drank cold water but not on the clock, Rucked 6x/week in the AM (see below), got over 8 hours/day of sleep, did my own HT program by feel, and logged my diet. So I was much closer to following this program to the letter than I was in 2011 when what I did was really bastardized.

It broke down like this:

Duration: 

Half of August and all of September, 6 weeks.

Exercise:

Ruck just about every weekday morning, weekends into Crunch for early AM lifts.

36 rucks, 6/week. Took a few hikes on the weekends: Day to Freeman Creek grove, Weekend to Forks of the Kern and a Weekend to end it to George Lake. The morning ruck started with about 30 water bottles in the ruck; after a while I stopped added bottles because they no longer fit in the pack. Finally weighed the pack in the final week: 65 lbs.

Lift was mostly all HT, with basic 40 for main lifts. Frequency was really high; 30 workouts in 6 weeks = 5x/week. Many days, these were PM on top of AM rucking.

During Sprintember, sprinted after AM ruck just about every third day - all simple 60 walkbacks in the street - 9 sessions, just over 2x/week.

Cals and Macros:

Ate an average of 2419 cals/day, with a mental stopping point of 2000/day. With an average of 809 cals/day for exercise, the total was 1610.

Breakdown was 35% fat, 22% carb and 43% protein, with an average of 257g protein/day, and 128g carbs. I've come a long way in my ability to keep with my macros.

I didn't do it to lose weight, or I would have eaten fewer calories per day (a true 2000/day prior to exercise subtractions, rather than 2400); this cycle was more of a recomp with really high training frequency, and a focus to keep my macros clean.

Measurements:




As you can see by the grid, measurements didn't really move all that much. One expects about .5" off the waist each week of this, and it moved 1.5" in the first 4 weeks. If I cut calories more, say, by 400/day true calories, it probably would have shrunk the waist size more. Everything else remained basically static. 

I didn't take any befores or afters, but I can see that I did lose some subcutaneous fat, and gained some muscle to compensate - thus the static measurements. If I really wanted to cut fat and lose weight, I would 

• Train more heavily and less frequently (4x week instead of 6x)

• Fewer calories/day (2000 true calories instead of 2419, no accounting for cals lost in exercise)

• Eat as cleanly as I did this cycle.

I usually end these recaps with what I'll do next (and then never do it). But I anticipate cycling this again in November after Squatober, and again in January (after Deadcember), and again in March (after a Pump City), and my hope would be to lose 4 or 5 lbs each round. 228 down to 224 down to 220 down to 215, and just alternate a power building 4 week cycle with a 4 week Velocity/Leangains cycle, until I'm about 210 or 10% body fat. Hold the body weight during the power cycles, and lose during the cuts.

Closing out this cycle with a hike to George lake, I was on the trail thinking about how I handled a pack and long pulls up slopes when I weighed 40 lbs less, and was doing math in my head about how to weigh 205 or so again. It's important, and I really should give it a try.

Friday, October 29, 2021

Squatober 2021.

 Well, this ain't the first rodeo. Same things as previous years still apply: 

- It's a lot of squatting, which I'm still not confident about, and in which I still don't feel like I have a lot of top end

- It's a lot of pressing, especially benching; more than I'm accustomed to, and not as much antagonistic pulling (so I worked in a couple of bonus pulling days to compensate)

- Macros and sleeping were good, did all workouts as Rx'ed, felt great, and felt sore 

- It's great powerbuilding programming at the right price

- Lots of farmer's walking was good for the core this year, forgot that these were so legit

Didn't PR or anything (some of that's thanks to covid all through July and the major setback that that was to all things muscular), but I felt solid in my form, depth, and didn't experience knee pain or glute insertion pain as I have for the last couple of years. 

On PR party day, I had an easy 305, and couldn't get 315 up out of the hole. Not what I want, but what is reality for me. I feel like I'm in a place where I have a basis for continuing strength here though. Deadlift has come along in the past couple of years, and I feel like the tide is rising. Just have to consciously put more weight on the bar than feels comfortable. On heavy days, I still had a sense of creeping dread that I would fail. But the bar was going up, and form was spot on this year — something that wasn't as true in the past as it was this go around. It's still a wonder that I can bench the same weight I'm squatting with ease and without hesitation, but the squat is always with trepidation and without confidence.

Gained 5lbs, but lost a half inch off of the waist. Felt throughout the month that the quads and boot were more solid, and true enough, gained most there. Knee gained the most, I really wish I had access to a leg extension machine.

Like I said, gained 5lbs, on 2734 cals/day average, and was using the creatine. Helped with recovery. 212g protein a day, 186g carb, 130 fat. 443 cals/day for workouts, which was the highest average for the year (I don't usually go for an hour lifting).

Another great month of solid programming. Good for my comeback from Covid weakness, good for my squat confidence.

Friday, April 02, 2021

CFFB - DL and Pulls & Float Month Assessment - 210402

Buy in
3x lunge/ypulls/rollouts 

Mains

DL 276/325/2x355/325/275

Weighted pull up +35 3x3 / iso dB press 7@54


Cash out 

Bag work 8 mins


This is a day late to end the 4 week breather between 8 week cuts to begin this year. Doing the mashup of the CFFB 3x5 double main movements with an LP each week to the weights used; felt good. Adding in Buy ins and Finishers (thought a lot about which ones to use for this) was good mental exercise. I'll continue the structure of the format for as long as it lasts - 4 on/3 off through beginning of summer. 

To recap the last 4 weeks, I was doing IF most days with just ozonated water, coffee and BCAAs until noon, and on/off schedule just happened to fall into a 4/1, 3/1, 2/1, 1/1, 2/1, 3/1, 4/1 breakdown. Cool looking on the calendar, came out to basically 2/1. 

Took creatine for the last month, and put back on 9 lbs (212 to 221) but BF% stayed at 12. Added back an inch at the neck, 1.5 at the chest, 2 at the hip, and .5 at the thigh and waist. I was worried about eating like a pig and just going right back to old measurements, so only a half inch back on the waist was in line with my objectives here. During the cut, ate 2326 cals/day (2147 after exercise deduction) and 2577 (2238 after exercise) so only 200/day more (and only 50 more after exercise) with means I ate not as little as I might've during the cut, and I also trained harder during this last month (179 cals/day vs 349 cals/day). Protein was 209 g/day, up 19 g/day, but carbs were up 60.

Creatine makes a big difference. I don't feel larger but just yesterday all the welders at the shop were saying that I was huge. Not really my goal but I think it's where adding a little more muscle without adding fat makes people look noteworthy. I didn't eat enough to add 9 lbs this month, so it's water in the muscle bellies via the creatine.


9.5-1 hours - 2100/0630. 49+8 minutes total, PE: 7. 24 hours. 221/12.

Sunday, March 28, 2021

HT Pulling - 210328

8! Wide grip BW chins / 9! OHP @105

4x5/x12s

Pendlay @185 / Dyno push ups
 

4x11

Side laterals/rear laterals 30-32s/Meadows

3x10/9/8

Ez in T/C/DB curl w30


HT day, what a good feeling. No buy in or cash out, just thinking shoulder work today.


7.5 hours - 2300/0630. 59 minutes total, PE: 7. 24 hours. 220/12.

Saturday, March 27, 2021

CFFB Squat & Bench Press - 210327

Buy in - 3 rds
Good Mornings @95 - FtB - Muscle Snatch @105

Mains
Squat 135,185, 4x5 @235
Bench 4x5 @235, 2 @275

Finisher 4 rds x10+
RDL 185 - Hip - OHS @48

Opening up the shoulders, still. Squat wants some love. There is a mental or physical block there.

9 hours - 2130/0630. 72 minutes total, PE: 7. 24 hours. 220/12.

Friday, March 26, 2021

CFFB Power Cleans and Chins - 210326

Not posting all of these sessions, just keeping up enough posts to keep FutureMe in the know - that this little patch of between-the-cuts is functioning. Added back 300 cals/day to 2500ish, and taking Creatine, up 6 lbs. Feeling tired all the time but the numbers are going up on all the lifts.

Mains

Pwr Clean @145/165//170//

4x3/4/4/3 Weighted Chin +30


4x10-7

Side Laterals

Trap shrug @275


Finisher 4 rds x10s, 1:30 RI

Shrug/Ez out/hammers


9-1 hours - 2130/0630. 51 minutes total, PE: 6. 48 hours. 219/13.

Wednesday, March 24, 2021

CFFB Pulls & Trap Deads - 210324

Buy in 4 rds 
Muscle snatches @100

Main 2+ RI

4x4 Weighted pull up +30

4x6/7/8/9 Trap dead 275

Finisher 4 rds x10s, 1:30 RI

RDL 185 - Hip ez - OHS @43


Still opening up the shoulders. Programming in more Y-pulls. But the OH Squats aren't hurting like they were. Bar only, I know.


9-1 hours - 2130/0630. 55 minutes total, PE: 8 late, early 7. 24 hours. 218/13.

Thursday, March 18, 2021

CFFB Front Squat / W Chins - 210318

Buy in:

3 rounds 

Back lunges/Rollouts 


1x5 @ 135/3x5 Front squat @155


4 weighted Chins / trap shrugs


Finisher: 

4 hip/light RDL 10's @165


Just getting out there, keeping in step with the 4 day/week CFFB schedule, but not logging all of it. Today was supposed to be OHP instead of the Chins, I just spaced it. Taking everything easy still on that right hamstring-glute insertion, which still feels strained from Squatober.


8 -1 hours - 2130/0530. 53 minutes total, PE: 7. 48 hours.  

Tuesday, March 16, 2021

Easy A - 210316

Buy in :
3 rounds 
Kb swings x15/cleans x4

3 weighted Chins /OHS light/KtE


4 Meadows @170/iso OHP @54


3 Iso C/trap dead shrug


9.5 -2 hours - 2130/700.  minutes total, PE: 8. 24 hours. 218/13. 

Sunday, March 14, 2021

Flat Ruck - 210314

Just an easy walk with 39# in the new Highland Tactical Foxtrot Ruck. I'm too thick around the middle for the waist strap, not that I need it. Dunno if that had anything to do with the way it carries, but I was really feeling some cramping in the traps. Not as bad as with the issue ruck (remember that day on the Forks trail?) but bad enough. Either my shoulder girdle gets into better shape, or I start rucking with less weight/use something with a hip belt that carries some of the load.

Three miles easy along the bike path in trail runners, just under an hour, never out of breath today.

Friday, March 12, 2021

CFFB Front Squat / OHP easy - 210312

AM: Juggled the weights around between DBs to try to better complete a set of singles with 1# increments where I'm using them.
Couldn't help myself but to do iso hammers with 40/39/35/34/33/32/30, supersetted with french press tris.

PM: The CFFB workout that I almost didn't do because my butt's sore. 

Buy in:
4 iso KBs x15/goblets x10/Hip x10-12  

Front Squat 3x5 150  
... these are light, but they felt good. Coming in sore, I thought there would be tearing pains, but ... pleasantly surprised.

OHP 3x5 118 (super'ed with single calf raises)

A couple light RDLs and Good Mornings to cash out and test to ensure the right butt was listening to reason. I'm feeling a little thin in the skin, motivated, but knowing that limit strength just isn't there right now. No IF today or yesterday. Going to feed for the rest of the month and see if I power up.

9 - 2 hours - 2100/0600. 17 + 38 minutes total, PE: 7. 24 hours. 
217/14.

Thursday, March 11, 2021

CFFB DL / Weighted Pulls - 210310

No Buy In ... feeling sore and tired but I have the bug to train. Took yesterday off; an act of the will. Funny, should be desiring homeostasis and lounging. The will says to do this thing.

DL 5s 145/235/285/4@335/2@355
Yes, I lost some strength over the last couple of months.


Weighted pull up, 3s w/+25


Finisher 4x10s
Iso Inc 65#/flyes/meadows 

8.5 hours - 2100/0530. 58 minutes total, PE: 7. 48 hours. 
216/14.

Tuesday, March 09, 2021

Squat 5RM - 210309

Buy in 4 rounds, .75 RI
15 Kb swings / 10 rollouts / 20 walking lunges w/ single 30#
... some same right ass pain, which diminished as we went. 

Squat - find 5RM, 2:30 RI
135 / 165 / 195 / 225 ///
... annnd the ass pain is back. Afraid I’m aggravating it (but not so afraid I didn’t finish the sets across).

Hip x10ish / RDL x10 @ 145 
4x finisher, non-rotated, 1:30 RI

Next time up, heavier doubles. 

9 hours - 2100/0630. 58 minutes total, PE: 8. 24 hours. 
215/13.

Monday, March 08, 2021

OG Volkswagen - 210308

Buy in
3x8 of all, .60 RI
Chin
MS @ 95#
SBJ - these are weak!
KtE
OHS - bar only

- 5 mins -
OG Volkswagen for time, no spotter
21/15/9 
Bench press @ 217.5
Pull ups 
22.01
... this gassed me more than I would have anticipated on paper. The first round of pull ups were harder than I thought they should have been (strict).

4x10
Rev BBBO @145# / Cav Press 30#

4x rotated finisher
Shrug x10/BB curl x12/Tri x14

9 hours - 2100/0630. 75 minutes total, PE: 10. 24 hours. 
216/14.

Sunday, February 28, 2021

8 Week "LeanGains" IF Cut.

Just finished another 8 week cut, from January through end of February, 2021. Not a true LeanGains cut, because I didn't do the Reverse Pyramid training. I didn't do any real, progressive training at all (work, work, work, and not under the bar, if you know what I mean). If anything, this cycle goes to prove that this program works. The basic elements make it work: Intermittent Fasting with a caloric deficit and a modium of physical activity; the heavy lifting only serves to ensure that one doesn't lose strength and muscle.

Objectives: Compositional; cut some of the thickness around the waist, don't lose much or any of the good stuff. Lose 4 or 5% bodyfat, which would be a loss of body weight from 227 down to 218 or 215. 

Start: 227/15% BF
End: 212/12% BF

So I lost 15 lbs, which is a significant number, looking back. A couple of pounds a week, but I didn't feel it going at all. I used the caloric daily objectives from last time I did this cut (but wasn't as focused on differentiating between training day/rest day calories). Goal was 14000 cals a week - or 2000/day, but I ate 2326/day on average. Goal is over 200g protein/day, but I was at 190g. Try to have carbs under 100g/day, but I was at 118/day.

I would have preferred to see Protein at 40% or more and Carbs at 20% or less. So, I didn't hit any of my marks, but this still worked well enough. Maybe not doing this during football season would help - late January with playoff game Sundays and Super Bowl Sunday in February; these three "bites" are enough to shake up the average for the whole cycle. 
Besides, cutting when the weather is cold is contradictory to nature. Still, we'll take this all as a win.

Did IF everyday, and on weekdays, it was easy to have coffee and one drink of BCAAs (two scoops, 14g pro) each day til noon. Many days I bubbled ozone water first thing, and I think on an empty stomach, this helps tighten things up (maybe kills candida, which shrinks all the pipes in there under the fat?). Shrinking the midsection's not only about losing fat, it can be surely be about doing TVA vacuums and not having guts full of sludge.

Didn't get to train heavy as I would have liked, on the road with long days at a job site an hour from home, so was away from 4am to 7pm. I brought DBs in the truck with me, and a ruck with water bottles in it, and did 6 sets of squats every other weekday, and some flies/curls with them. 

Being able to do some NEPA walks in the AM, and some rucking would have helped a lot. I did walk a good bit early on at the job site each day, before having to use a buggy to get around and move gear. 

So the whole cycle was an approximation, in both the nutritional side but surely on the training side, but it was successful. Again, the goals coming in were to get around 215 (did), lose off the waist (3 inches from 40.5 to 37.5) and not lose everywhere else or lose significant strength.  

I didn't gain any size in the arms, even with that being kind of a focus. Neck down an inch, chest down 1.5, Hip down 3. Shoulder girdle grew 1.5. Added another belt hole to the belt-I-had-to-add-belt-holes-to during the cut in 2018 (yeah, time to get some new belts) ... waist ended at 38.5 then, so another inch off was a plus, even from last time when I was adhering pretty strictly to the protocols. I think I ate cleaner this time, which is to say carbs might have been up a bit but those carbs were foody, and not refined sugars.

Want to hold here for a month and eat at 2500 cals/day for a while, then do another cut and get the waist down even more. I may not see 33 or 33.5 as Steve Reeves and the ancient Romans would like, but 34 is within reach. 

Recomping this year for reals and for good, not just a nebulous purpose that I write about, cut for, and then find at the end of the year, the numbers are basically the same as before. Maintaining at 212 and holding here will be a good test for 4 weeks at least, while keeping the waist from expanding right back to 39 or 40 will be a win. Then drop under 210, down to 205 say, during another 8 week cycle in April - May. The idea this year is to get light enough and lean enough to then work on power-endurance and rucking without all the wear and tear. Limit strength on the backburner (still simmering there though). 

Time and determination will tell.

Monday, November 09, 2020

There's No Vaccination Against Vaccines.

by Nina Silver, Ph.D. The Politics of Illness and the Nature of Health, The Handbook of Rife Frequency Healing, 2001.

...in case it is assumed that the "side" effects of drugs occur only during illness, keep in mind that an entire group of drugs is given only when people are well: vaccines. 

As a matter of fact, the medical community’s official position is that vaccinations are only supposed to be given to people who are presumed healthy. This is for a very good reason: the immune function of people who are ill is already too weak to handle the effects that the vaccines are designed to produce. Nonetheless, most doctors ignore this wisdom and routinely vaccinate everybody whether they are healthy or sick. However, no one should be vaccinated, given the current processing methods and materials used to produce the vaccines.

Although mainstream medicine claims that vaccinations are necessary to eradicate disease, there are three major rebuttals to this argument that vaccination proponents never discuss.

First, history shows us that serious diseases decreased with the advent of indoor plumbing and improved sanitation, better protection from the elements (including more adequate clothing), and cleaner food handling and storage. 

Second, the Center for Disease Control (formerly the U.S. Public Health Service) has been shown to manipulate statistics by changing the name of the disease and thus disguising the number of inoculation-related outbreaks. In a 1994 edition of the Townsend Letter for Doctors, nutritional biochemist and physiologist A. Van Beveren writes that because "in nearly every state where the Salk vaccine was administered the polio rate leaped by 400-600%," what was then the Public Health Service responded by issuing "new guidelines for the diagnosis of the disease."

...From statistics we note that polio ceased to be a big problem almost immediately [after inoculation] but that suddenly aseptic or viral meningitis (sometimes spinal meningitis or multiple sclerosis) were seen in epidemic proportions in approximately the same number that polio was diagnosed in prior years...In Archives of Pediatrics (1950), Dr. Ralph Scoby lists not less that 170 diseases with "polio-like symptoms and effects, but with different names... little mention is made of the fact that polio disappeared in Europe without mass immunization, and of the 25 or so cases of polio that have turned up on the past few years, virtually all were vaccine induced."

The third argument against inoculation is based on incontrovertible evidence that it radically reduces immune function. Vaccination is more than merely ineffective; it actively encourages disease because of what it introduces into the system, and the manner in which it does it. Vaccines consist of dangerous and foreign materials that we were never meant to designed to ingest or metabolize: formaldehyde; the toxic metals aluminum and mercury; and the "main" ingredients of dried pus, scabs, blood and other decomposed proteins from animals. The medical establishment, by classifying these items as medical ingredients under the term "immunization," lends an air of integrity and validity to the practice of injecting poisons into the bloodstream. Now, injecting a poison into the bloodstream prevents the body from removing it in the most efficient and thorough manner.  

Normally, foreign material gets into the body through the mucous membranes, which act as a natural barrier to protect the body from foreign substances, everything that is not-body. The body responds to foreign irritants by expelling them in the same manner in which they arrived, back through the mucous membranes by coughing and sneezing and sometimes vomiting. But although the body is designed to eliminate viruses and other microbes efficiently, vaccinations, as Van Beveren points out, bypass the body's "carefully designed evolutionary system by introducing toxic matter directly into the bloodstream. This gives the body no warning, no generalized inflammatory response, no chance to recognize... or defend itself against future challenges from typical antigens [foreign irritants]."

To compound the problem, inoculations contain viruses that are unnaturally weakened. This means that the microbe is present at too low a level to stimulate the body into its usual defense mode, which can eventually create a health crisis. As Van Beveren explains,

...The body does not usually tolerate viruses unless they have been weakened (so as not to awaken a strong response) or tricked through a route (usually injection) that by-passes many organs and functions that would inevitably lead to normal, natural expulsion. But [by being] synthetically weakened and directly introduced into the bloodstream, these bits of aberrant nucleoproteins are capable of remaining latent toxicants for many years without continually provoking acute illness, yet keeping the defense system restless and 'on guard' almost indefinitely."

Being "on guard" in this way continually creates enormous physical stress on the system. Its psychological parallel is anxiety. Meanwhile the viruses are reproducing, stealing and using the body's own DNA in order to multiply (as all viruses do) — but unlike the situation with unaltered viruses, the body has not been stimulated properly to stop them. Eventually, the weakened viruses become too plentiful for the body to ignore. But by then, Van Beveren writes, so many of these weakened viruses have been incorporated "into an appropriate chromosome [of the body's cells] and start the production of non-self proteins, [that] the only proper response from the organism must be to make antibodies — against its own cells."

This is why there has been such an astronomical increase of chronic and degenerative, so-called auto-immune diseases. The body attacks itself because it is no longer able to recognize its own cells due to the gradual stealthy intrusion of unnaturally introduced, foreign material. 

In 1976, at a seminar sponsored by the American Cancer Society, Rutgers University professor Robert Simpson warned about this same phenomenon. "Immunization programs against flu, measles, mumps, polio, and so forth, may actually be seeding humans with RNA to form latent proviruses in cells throughout the body. These latent proviruses...when activated under the proper conditions...could cause a variety of disease." Some of the disease conditions he specified are rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematous, Parkinson's disease, and "possibly cancer." Van Beveren has identified hemolytic anemia, granulocytopenias and thrombocytopenias, immune thyroiditis, sympathetic ophthalmopathy and chronic active hepatitis; with other diseases such as poly arthritis, rheumatic fever, endo-myocarditis, periarteritis nodosa, Addison's disease, atrophic gastritis, pernicious anemia, immune pancreatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and ulcerative colitis as containing elements of auto-immune dysfunction. 

These men are not alone in this assessment: many other scientists and doctors have reached similar conclusions. In her well researched book, Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, Second Edition, Walene James provides abundant documentation showing a cause-and-effect relationship between the administration of vaccines and a subsequent rise in the vaccine-specific disease. James mentions generalized glandular and organ damage, allergies, and developmental disorders as well as more specific diseases such as encephalitis.

It is significant that medical doctors "are the least inoculated group in the United States," according to Van Beveren. He suggests that these doctors "know the thymus gland in vaccinated children atrophies much more, much faster, than in countries whose children are allowed to initiate a generalized inflammatory response."

Despite the many excellent reasons not to vaccinate, with the increase in genetically engineered foods and microbes as well as unprecedented travel to foreign countries with foreign microbes to which the body has not developed a natural immunity, there is definitely a need to help people develop a resistance against microbes to which they are not normally exposed.

Sunday, November 01, 2020

Squatober 2020.

The bottom line: Adjusted up my Training max grid twice during the month, and landed on the final max test day at a +25# PR over last year's heaviest rep. All reps this month were deep and high bar. Reps felt a lot more solid and balanced too, compared to last year. 

Gyms are closed this year, but the backyard gym is always open. The backyard was open last year for Squatober 2019, but I did the whole month solo. This year Konrad did a few of them with me, still PR'ed on my own.

This year I got my hands on a new bar to celebrate and to keep in the rack solely for squatting. The Pendlay bar got to rest on the new pulling platform for cleans, and RDLs, and Snatch grip Deads. Also made a lightweight pressing stand out of scrap wood and moved the Bella bar over to it. This year's programming called for a lot of heavy BB curls by 5's, so any curling didn't happen in the Squat rack (it happened in the pressing rack, which is totally okay).

Gained three pounds during the month. Got at least 8 hours sleep, and ate right (I fasted one day, during the Shandon/Portland prayer weekend at the end). Workouts usually took 70 minutes. Took six days off out of the 31. Averaged 2600 calories a day, including the weekends, 474 exercise calories.  Macros were Fat: 137, Carbs: 151, Protein: 265. All better breakdown than I'd been doing for the rest of the year.

This year featured a couple of the see saw days, a same-workout back-to-back Deja Vu day(s), and a couple of test days that required doing 21 reps in as few sets as possible, rather than max reps with 90%. These were set at the two and three week points; did the tests ["Party with" and "Party like"] and raised my TM after week two, but not after week three.
So many days this month I looked at the workout and wondered if I would be able to accomplish it. Found out each day that the program was just hard enough, doable but satisfying afterward. Someone online said that this is great programming at any price, and I agree.

As with last year (and with Deadcember) there was more pressing than pulling, and I'd try to make this up a bit. Some of that is how I feel since I make the pulling a priority. Also added in some RDLs as so much is quad-centric.

I really found that I love snatch-grip Deads this year. Never would have tried them otherwise. 

Throughout the month, my right leg was feeling like it wasn't pulling its weight (pushing its fair share, I should say) and right tibial tuberosity was feeling sore to the touch, reminiscent of the trauma from Feb 2018's sprint MCL-strain. Initial measurements at the beginning of the month showed that the right quad and right knee were both smaller than the left. Some imbalance there, or some favoritism as maybe I'm subconsciously limping along. Lunges throughout the month were particularly painful when the right leg was doing work, so much so that if I wasn't warmed up well, I simply couldn't lunge.

I still feel persistent pain under my glute where the hamstring inserts, taking it easy to heal up for Deadcember.

Going forward, I'm going to continue to squat heavy! Sets of doubles and triples for the win in 2021.

Thursday, August 13, 2020

At Least 12 Reasons Why Optavia Sucks.

You've heard of Optavia. Someone on social media posts a picture of themselves looking fat, side by side with a picture of them looking slim. "I've lost 40 pounds and I've kept it off for 40 weeks - all without exercise! ... Ask me how." Right? You ask, and they sign you up to eat the pre-packaged food that they've been eating for the last year. And then, 10 months and a thousand dollars later, you're the one who's lost weight, and you post pics of yourself, and you sell Optavia to the next player. Everyone wins.

Wrong. Optavia is wrong. Here's why.

1. You will lose weight. That's the goal right? Lose weight! No, the goal is to lose weight ... forever. On Optavia, you will lose weight until you stop buying Optavia. Then you will gain the weight back that you lost, and then some. Because without buying the product, there is no weight loss plan. Optavia sucks because it's just like every other "diet" plan where you lose, stop, then gain it all back.

2. Losing weight forever might not be the goal after all. Losing FAT forever, that's the goal, isn't it? You won't focus on losing fat on Optavia. Why? Lots of reasons. The food isn't designed for fat loss, you aren't on an exercise plan, there's no cycling involved, etc. Anyway, just sayin' - you will lose weight, but it's not going to be mostly fat. Instead:

3. You Will Lose Muscle on Optavia. All of it. What did you think would happen? 

Everyone knows what the bodybuilders know:

Eat More
+ Exercise
= Build Muscle.

You're doing the opposite:

Eat Less
+ No Exercise
= Lose Muscle. 

This is what you'll do on the Optavia program. Lose muscle, which is why you can lose "weight" so quickly – the body will most easily shed muscle in a crisis of undernourishment, not fat. This continues until there's no muscle left to lose, then your weight loss will stop.

4. Your weight loss will stop. The Optavia sell is "I lost X pounds and kept them off!" But the truth is that you'll stall, and probably not hit your *target* weight. Why? You don't have an endless supply of muscle to lose. You'll lose muscle until your body realizes that it's in a dangerous state of malnutrition, gives up on muscle loss and actually starts stockpiling fat to ensure survival. Your weight loss will stall. You'll be stuck X number of pounds lighter, and may be keeping them off, but with less muscle, more fat and a lighter bank account every month. 

5. Did we mention your bank account? Optavia is overpriced. If you broke down the actual foodstuffs into meals and purchased them in the store yourself, you'd spend far less. You can buy normal food, and even add in some supplements, and eat healthier on your own, for less. There's a price to all that pre-packaging. And, remember, your "health coach" and their "health coach" and their "health coach" all are making a cut off of your monthly bill.

6. Optavia is a business plan, not a health plan. Yeah, that "health coach" who cares so much about you and your progress? They're making money off the money you spend on the product. You're just another Egyptian slave building their multi-level marketing-Pyramid scheme. See how many caring texts you get from your "health coach" the day after you stop buying in.

7. Optavia is malnutrition. This is obvious, and you should know it the first time you set eyes on the pre-packaged meals. Nothing is fresh, everything is processed. Everything has sugars; it's all surprisingly high in carbohydrates. It tastes good, you will lose weight. But this stuff is terrible for your body.

8. You will get weaker on Optavia. You won't be able to run farther or faster. You won't be able to do a pull up. You won't even look stronger. You're not going to be able to pose flexing a bicep when this is done. You won't have muscle to show. You'll look slimmer in your streetclothes, but that's it. In fact, truly athletic people who know the difference, if they're honest with you, will tell you that you don't look well. Sure, everyone at the office will ask, "Have you lost weight?" Or tell you that "You look great!" But they're just being polite, or they're just ignorant of what true fitness looks like.

9. You will probably get sick after you're done. This is malnutrition, remember. Read the labels. The Optavia food is poorly balanced and composed. Ask around and see how many people who have been on the program had a serious illness afterward. See if their hair has thinned or changed color. Have they had to ramp up the prescription for their vision? Is that bad back of theirs flaring up? Do they have brain fog, depression, grumpiness? Is their physical activity level lower? Do they simply look older? These are the sorts of unintended consequences of poor nutrition over time.

10. Eating every couple of hours is a good for cravings and good for diabetes. You won't be hungry on Optavia! But you won't be any different than most diabetically-disposed-obese people who eat their way through their day. Especially without any exercise. Some bodybuilders eat every two hours, but their lives are built around exercise. 

11. You won't learn anything about how to eat, live your life, Macros or Micros, anything, on this program. "Macros? What is he even talking about?" Right, my point exactly. When you leave the program, you won't know about macronutrients or vitamin intake, how to make food choices based on your fitness goals, how to count calories, how to plan meals, break down dietary cycles... anything except how to slap down your credit card and buy their system. Someday, you have to stop doing their system - did you think you were going to be on Optavia forever? - and then what? Right, go back to your old habits and ways of eating and overeating.
You will have learned nothing about health when it's all said and done. You bought their food, but you didn't learn about food. You had a "health coach" but you didn't learn anything about health. Welcome back to Right Where You Startedland.

12. The program isn't for you. It's a one-size-fits-all pre-packaged box of goods. The program isn't based on any body composition analysis (how much body fat do you have as a percentage of your body mass? Therefore, how much fat weight can you lose and be lean? What is the timeline to lose that weight? Therefore, how many calories per week are you going to eat? What's the breakdown of those calories? And later, now that you're lighter, let's adjust all these numbers - these basic questions are the basis of any normal weight loss plan), instead, it's just an arbitrary number. You weigh 180 and want to lose 25? Great! Here's your plan: Buy Optavia. You weigh 150 and want to lose 35? Great! Here's your plan: Buy Optavia.

The fact is, you are unique and your needs are unique. There's a little bit of thought and customization that must go into your lifestyle program if you're to succeed in a cycle of fat loss, and this thought and customization continues regularly into an ongoing healthy lifestyle. There's a learning curve, but really, it isn't steep. Apply yourself. You're worth the effort.

I could go on. There are other reasons why the Optavia program sucks, but they're criticisms from the point of view of someone who knows what to do and how to do it - not considerations for those who are in the market for an Optavia-Jenny Craig-like program. Most people just want something easy to do, something they don't have to think about, and that will work. I get it.

So where to start that doesn't suck? Here, try Intermittent Fasting. Nothing's easier than eating just a bit less, saving a little money on food instead of spending more, kicking diabetic predisposition right in the guts, and maybe losing some fat instead of mostly losing muscle. 

There are many considerations, and many ways to customize your program, but only you can do it for you. Start with simple habits that make sense, and when you're ready, you can do some serious and semi-complex fat cutting cycles,  don't fall for any scheme that exchanges your money for garbage product, platitudes, and the same old diet-trap results.

Sunday, May 17, 2020

Shallow Social Media and Deep Work.

Pop artist John Mayer went through a creative dry spell after releasing the album Continuum in 2006. He wrestled, and finally he closed his Twitter account and confessed on his blog his own creative desert was a result of social media addiction: “The tweets are getting shorter, but the songs are still four minutes long. You’re coming up with 140-character zingers, and the song is still four minutes long… I realized about a year ago that I couldn’t have a complete thought anymore, and I was a tweetaholic. I had four million Twitter followers, and I was always writing on it. ...it started to make my mind smaller and smaller and smaller. And I couldn’t write a song.” 

Social media distraction actually atrophied his creative capacity. “You can’t create lasting art if you are heavily involved in social media. It occurred to me that since the invocation of Twitter, nobody who has participated in it has created any lasting art. And yes! Yours truly is included in that roundup as well. Those who decide to remain offline will make better work than those online. Why? Because great ideas have to gather. They have to pass the test of withstanding thirteen different moods, four different months and sixty different edits. Anything less is day trading. You can either get a bunch of mentions now or change someone’s life next year.”

It's not only Twitter, although it's apparent that limiting discourse to 140 characters obviously limits the scope of thought. Limiting conversation to a photo, ala Instagram, or the power of video to slapstick shorts ala Vine–come-TikTok narrows the mental appetite with sips of dopamine. 

Continually ingesting bits of social media has become a distraction and an inhibitor in the creative development process. Becoming a creative who can generate works with lasting cultural impact requires what Georgetown professor Cal Newport calls “deep work” - which is a combination of working for extended periods of time with full concentration on a single task free from distraction or interruption followed by intermittent rounds of feedback. A process where one wrings every last drop of value out of their current intellectual capacities. Cal Newport maintains that our creative abilities are improved by the mental strain that accompanies deep work.

It's not deep work to swipe or scroll, we all know it's mind numbing. Our cultural addiction to social media is killing songs and artists and dreamers before we ever get to hear their voices, melodies and ideas. I wonder when our grandchildren ask, "What did you do during the 'Shelter-in-Place' of 2020?" most will have to admit that we wasted the days bingeing memes.

Are you a content creator rather than a content consumer? If you've read this far, there's hope for you. Stand up, shut this off, and tune in to the deep work of your own thoughts.